Inflation Reduction Act potentially doubles R&D tax credit

Inflation Reduction Act potentially doubles R&D tax credit

By Michael Cohn from Accounting Today August 18, 2022, 5:10 p.m. EDT 3 Min Read

The Inflation Reduction Act that President Biden signed into law this week has a lesser known provision that could benefit many small business startups, allowing them to potentially double the amount they can claim on the research and development tax credit from $250,000 to $500,000 per year against payroll taxes.

Under current law small businesses that may not have enough income tax liability to take advantage of their research and development credit can apply up to $250,000 of the credit toward their Social Security payroll tax liability, according to Top 100 Firm Marcum LLP. To qualify for the expanded credit, the small business would need to have less than $5 million of gross receipts and be less than five years old. The Inflation Reduction Act would permit an additional credit of up to $250,000 to be applied against the Medicare payroll tax for tax years starting after Dec. 31, 2022.

The expanded R&D tax credit probably won’t show up on tax returns until 2024 since it can first be claimed for tax year 2023, but it could boost small businesses, particularly the startups that it can incentivize.

biden-joe-manchin-inflation-reduction-act.jpg
President Joe Biden signs H.R. 5376, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, in the State Dining Room of the White House.
Sarah Silbiger/Bloomberg

“Just by virtue of having it in this historic bill shows just how significant this credit is viewed by both sides of the aisle,” said Chris Winslow, CEO of Clarus R+D, a fintech software company that helps businesses claim R&D tax credits. “It continues a legacy of support for research and development in the U.S. This particular change is focused on small businesses, which are the cornerstone of innovation and growth in the U.S. This shows a recommitment by the federal government to support those small businesses as they expand their R&D capabilities and investment.”

He expects to see additional guidance on claiming the tax credit to be released by the Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department.

“More details will need to be wrapped around this, but it’s essentially raising the cap for small businesses from $250,000 today to be applied to payroll taxes, primarily FICA, to an additional $250,000 that will be allowed against the Medicare hospital insurance coverage,” he said. “Our research shows that only about half the people who are qualified to take the credit actually take the credit. I think the more opportunities to use the credit and the higher limits that people can claim will expand the overall market and and create more opportunity to fund innovation for today’s R&D customers.”

There will be some hurdles as the IRS has been increasing the requirements lately for documenting R&D activities, but Winslow noted that there have always been some requirements for documentation, which is what his software helps companies do.

“Because of the amount of credits, there is an opportunity going forward for additional requirements by the government to demonstrate the research and development activities that qualify for this credit in addition to the calculation of the credit amount,” he said. “This is what we’ve invested in heavily over the last five years is our software platform that creates efficiency for our customers to enter all the appropriate information that demonstrates their qualification under the law, but in addition creates a highly detailed compliant report that supports the requirements that the IRS has for demonstration of research and development activities that qualify.”

A September 2021 memorandum from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel said it wants more detailed information about all the business components for which the research credit claims relate for that year (see story). For each business component, companies will need to identify all the research activities they’ve performed and name the individuals who performed each research activity, along with the information each individual sought to discover. Refund claims for the research and development credit will also need to detail the total qualified employee wage expenses, total qualified supply expenses, and total qualified contract research expenses for the claim year, using Form 6765. The additional requirements have led to some consternation among companies and tax professionals (see story). But the expansion of the R&D credit under the Inflation Reduction Act should spur more interest in claiming the credits among companies, especially tech startups.

Ranking Property Taxes on the 2020 State Business Tax Climate Index

Today’s map shows states’ rankings on the property tax component of the 2020 State Business Tax Climate Index. The Index’s property tax component evaluates state and local taxes on real and personal property, net worth, and asset transfers. The property tax component accounts for 16.6 percent of each state’s overall Index score.

Property taxes matter to businesses for several reasons. First, businesses own a significant amount of real property, and tax rates on commercial property are often higher than the rates on comparable residential property. Many states and localities also levy taxes not only on the land and buildings a business owns but also on tangible property, such as machinery, equipment, and office furniture, as well as intangible property like patents and trademarks. Across the nation, property taxes impose one of the most substantial state and local tax burdens most businesses face. In fiscal year 2018, taxes on real, personal, and utility property accounted for 38 percent of all taxes paid by businesses to state and local governments, according to the Council on State Taxation.

Although taxes on real property tend to be unpopular with the public, a well-structured property tax generally conforms to the benefit principle (the idea in public finance that taxes paid should relate to benefits received) and is more transparent than most other taxes.

Taxes on intangible property, wealth, and asset transfers, on the other hand, are harmful and distortive. States that levy such taxes—including capital stock taxes, inventory and intangible property taxes, and estate, inheritance, gift, and real estate transfer taxes—are less economically attractive, as they create disincentives for investment and encourage businesses to make choices based on the tax code that they would not make otherwise. Businesses with valuable trademarks may seek to avoid headquartering in states with intangible property taxes, and shipping and distribution networks might be shaped by the presence or absence of inventory taxes.

States are in a better position to attract business investment when they maintain competitive real property tax rates and avoid harmful taxes on tangible personal property, intangible property, wealth, and asset transfers. This year, the states with the best scores on the property tax component are New Mexico, Indiana, North Dakota, Idaho, Utah, and Delaware. States with the worst scores in this component are Connecticut, Vermont, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Rhode Island, plus the District of Columbia.

Best and worst property tax codes in the country. See full state property tax code rankings in 2019.

Explore Our Interactive Tool

To gauge whether your state’s property tax structure has become more or less competitive in recent years, see the table below.

Property Tax Component of the State Business Tax Climate Index (2017–2020)
Note: A rank of 1 is best, 50 is worst. All scores are for fiscal years. DC’s score and rank do not affect other states.

Source: Tax Foundation.

State 2017 Rank 2018 Rank 2019 Rank 2020 Rank Change from 2019 to 2020
Alabama 18 12 16 15 1
Alaska 24 38 25 25 0
Arizona 6 6 6 8 -2
Arkansas 25 22 29 29 0
California 17 13 15 16 -1
Colorado 16 14 14 14 0
Connecticut 50 49 50 50 0
Delaware 11 20 7 6 1
Florida 13 10 13 13 0
Georgia 23 23 27 28 -1
Hawaii 9 16 11 11 0
Idaho 3 3 5 4 1
Illinois 41 45 40 40 0
Indiana 4 4 3 2 1
Iowa 35 39 35 35 0
Kansas 21 19 20 20 0
Kentucky 37 36 36 36 0
Louisiana 32 30 33 33 0
Maine 43 41 42 43 -1
Maryland 44 42 43 42 1
Massachusetts 47 46 48 48 0
Michigan 26 21 24 24 0
Minnesota 29 28 26 26 0
Mississippi 36 35 37 37 0
Missouri 7 7 8 7 1
Montana 12 9 12 12 0
Nebraska 40 40 41 41 0
Nevada 10 8 10 10 0
New Hampshire 42 44 44 44 0
New Jersey 49 50 47 47 0
New Mexico 1 1 1 1 0
New York 45 47 46 46 0
North Carolina 33 32 34 34 0
North Dakota 2 2 2 3 -1
Ohio 8 11 9 9 0
Oklahoma 14 15 19 19 0
Oregon 19 18 17 18 -1
Pennsylvania 22 33 22 21 1
Rhode Island 46 43 45 45 0
South Carolina 27 24 30 30 0
South Dakota 20 25 21 22 -1
Tennessee 31 29 31 31 0
Texas 38 37 38 38 0
Utah 5 5 4 5 -1
Vermont 48 48 49 49 0
Virginia 30 31 32 32 0
Washington 28 27 28 27 1
West Virginia 15 17 18 17 1
Wisconsin 34 26 23 23 0
Wyoming 39 34 39 39 0
District of Columbia 48 46 49 49 0

To learn more about how we determined these rankings, read our full methodology here.

Avalara’s Annual Sales Tax Report Highlights Major Changes for Nexus and Marketplace Law in 2020

SEATTLE, WA — December 11, 2019 — Avalara, Inc. (NYSE: AVLR), a leading provider of cloud-based tax compliance automation for businesses of all sizes, today released its fifth annual sales tax changes report. Key findings in the report point to the continued impact of economic nexus laws, escalating tensions around marketplace facilitator laws, an increase in online cross-border sales, and the growing role of technology in tax compliance heading into 2020.

In today’s global, omnichannel business landscape, accurate sales tax collection and remittance are essential for businesses of all sizes seeking to stay compliant and competitive. Avalara’s 2020 sales tax changes report reveals major changes in legislation and consumer preference that are poised to disrupt ecommerce in 2020.

“2019 was another landmark year for sales tax in the United States with broad adoption of economic nexus and marketplace facilitator laws,” said Scott Peterson, vice president of U.S. tax policy and government relations at Avalara. “As 2020 progresses, we can expect to see more changes take place domestically and abroad in the form of marketplace laws and global compliance. This report should serve as a resource for business leaders and tax professionals to better understand the tax landscape and make more informed decisions that keep businesses compliant and improve efficiency.”

  • Many states are approaching remote sales tax differently. Economic nexus is old news and the new norm, but businesses continue to struggle with understanding their liability in each state and how to craft their tax strategies accordingly.
  • Economic nexus laws will continue to change. Louisiana is set to begin enforcing economic nexus by July 2020. A bill recently filed in Florida, if approved, will make the Sunshine State the 44th state to adopt economic nexus. If passed, Missouri will then be the only state outside of those with no general sales tax that has yet to enact a similar rule.
  • Marketplace facilitator laws are creating a “Wayfair 2.0” scenario. More than 36 states have adopted marketplace facilitator laws that require online marketplaces to collect and remit sales tax on behalf of third-party sellers. But, major marketplaces aren’t accepting this without a fight. For example, Amazon is “vigorously” fighting a sales tax assessment for marketplace sales tax in South Carolina. Other states, like Hawaii and North Carolina, are expected to enact marketplace sales tax laws in 2020.
  • International selling will take center stage and bring new challenges. Forecasted to reach $1 trillion in sales by 2020, by 2022, cross-border ecommerce sales could account for more than 15% of the world’s online retail market. Major events around the globe will impact international gain for businesses, including Brexit, fraud, global marketplace laws, and shifting tariffs.
  • Technology is responding to growing sales tax complexity. Artificial intelligence, big data analytics, and cloud computing are expected to reach a tipping point for practical application for sales tax in 2020. States are also embracing technology with 24 states participating in the Streamlined Sales Tax (SST) program and providing tax technology to businesses at no cost.

For additional information on state sales tax changes, please visit the Avalara sales tax rates resource. For more information on marketplace facilitator laws, please visit the Avalara state-by-state marketplace facilitator guide.

Download the 2020 sales tax changes report here.

Corporate Tax Rates around the World, 2019

Key Findings

  • In general, large industrialized nations tend to have higher statutory corporate income tax rates than developing countries.
  • The worldwide average statutory corporate income tax rate, measured across 176 jurisdictions, is 24.18 percent. When weighted by GDP, the average statutory rate is 26.30 percent.
  • Europe has the lowest regional average rate, at 20.27 percent (25.13 percent when weighted by GDP). Conversely, Africa has the highest regional average statutory rate, at 28.45 percent (28.15 percent weighted by GDP).
  • The average top corporate rate among EU countries is 21.77 percent, 23.59 percent in OECD countries, and 27.65 percent in the G7.
  • The worldwide average statutory corporate tax rate has consistently decreased since 1980, with the largest decline occurring in the early 2000s.
  • The average statutory corporate tax rate has declined in every region since 1980.

Introduction

In 1980, corporate tax rates around the world averaged 40.38 percent, and 46.67 percent when weighted by GDP.[1] Since then countries have recognized the impact that high corporate tax rates have on business investment decisions so that in 2019, the average is now 24.18 percent, and 26.30 when weighted by GDP, for 176 separate tax jurisdictions.

Declines have been seen in every major region of the world including in the largest economies. The 2017 tax reform in the United States brought the statutory corporate income tax rate from among the highest in the world closer to the middle of the distribution. Whereas in 2017 the United States had the fourth highest corporate income tax rate in the world,[3] it now ranks towards the middle of the countries and tax jurisdictions surveyed.

European countries tend to have lower corporate income tax rates than countries in other regions, and many developing countries have corporate income tax rates that are above the worldwide average.

Today, most countries have corporate tax rates below 30 percent.

The Highest and Lowest Corporate Tax Rates in the World[4]

The majority of the 218 separate jurisdictions surveyed for the year 2019 have corporate tax rates below 25 percent and 111 have tax rates between 20 and 30 percent. The average tax rate among the 218 jurisdictions is 22.79 percent.[5] The United States has the 84th highest corporate tax rate with a combined statutory rate of 25.89 percent.

The 20 countries with the highest statutory corporate income tax rates span every region, albeit unequally. While nine of the top 20 countries are in Africa, Europe appears only twice and Asia once. Of the remaining jurisdictions, one is in Oceania, and eight are in the Americas.[6]

The only countries with large economies in the top 20 are France (34.43 percent) and Brazil (34 percent).

Table 1: 20 Highest Statutory Corporate Income Tax Rates in the World, 2019
Note: The table includes 21 jurisdictions because Cameroon, Colombia, Saint Kitts and Nevis, and the Seychelles all have the same tax rate.

*The United Arab Emirates is a federation of seven separate emirates. Since 1960, each emirate has the discretion to levy up to a 55 percent corporate tax rate on any business. In practice, this tax is mostly levied on foreign banks and petroleum companies. For more information on the taxation system in the United Arab Emirates, see PwC, “Worldwide Tax Summaries – Corporate income tax (CIT) rates.”

Sources: OECD, “Table II.1. Statutory corporate income tax rate,” updated April 2019, https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?DataSetCode=Table_II1; KPMG, “Corporate tax rates table,” https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/services/tax/tax-tools-and-resources/tax-rates-online/corporate-tax-rates-table.html; and researched individually, see .

Country Continent Rate
United Arab Emirates* Asia 55%
Comoros Africa 50%
Puerto Rico North America 37.5%
Suriname South America 36%
Chad Africa 35%
Democratic Republic of the Congo Africa 35%
Equatorial Guinea Africa 35%
Guinea Africa 35%
Kiribati Oceania 35%
Malta Europe 35%
Saint Martin (French Part) North America 35%
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) North America 35%
Sudan Africa 35%
Zambia Africa 35%
France Europe 34.43%
Brazil South America 34%
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) South America 34%
Cameroon Africa 33%
Colombia South America 33%
Saint Kitts and Nevis North America 33%
Seychelles Africa 33%

On the other end of the spectrum, the 20 countries with the lowest non-zero statutory corporate tax rates all charge rates lower than 15 percent. Eleven countries have statutory rates of 10 percent, six being small European nations (Andorra, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Gibraltar, Kosovo, and Macedonia). The only two major industrialized nations[7] represented among the bottom 20 countries are Ireland and Hungary. Ireland is known for its low 12.5 percent rate, which has been in place since 2003. Hungary reduced its corporate income tax rate from 19 to 9 percent in 2017.[8]

Table 2. 20 Lowest Statutory Corporate Income Tax Rates in the World, 2019 (Excluding Jurisdictions with a Corporate Income Tax Rate of Zero Percent)
Note: Table includes 21 jurisdictions because Cyprus, Ireland, and Liechtenstein all have the same tax rate.

Sources: OECD, “Table II.1. Statutory corporate income tax rate”; KPMG, “Corporate tax rates table”; and researched individually, see Tax Foundation, “worldwide-corporate-tax-rates/.”

Country Continent Rate
Barbados North America 5.5%
Uzbekistan Asia 7.5%
Turkmenistan Asia 8%
Hungary Europe 9%
Montenegro Europe 9%
Andorra Europe 10%
Bosnia and Herzegovina Europe 10%
Bulgaria Europe 10%
Gibraltar Europe 10%
Kosovo, Republic of Europe 10%
Kyrgyzstan Asia 10%
Nauru Oceania 10%
Paraguay South America 10%
Qatar Asia 10%
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Europe 10%
Timor-Leste Oceania 10%
China, Macao Special Administrative Region Asia 12%
Republic of Moldova Europe 12%
Cyprus Europe 12.5%
Ireland Europe 12.5%
Liechtenstein Europe 12.5%

Of the 218 jurisdictions surveyed, 13 currently do not impose a general corporate income tax. All these jurisdictions are small, island nations. A handful, such as the Cayman Islands and Bermuda, are well-known for their lack of corporate taxes. Bahrain has no general corporate income tax but has a targeted corporate income tax on oil companies.[9]

Table 3. Countries without General Corporate Income Tax, 2019
Sources: OECD, “Table II.1. Statutory corporate income tax rate”; KPMG, “Corporate tax rates table”; and researched individually, see Tax Foundation, “worldwide-corporate-tax-rates.”
Country Continent
Anguilla North America
Bahamas North America
Bahrain Asia
Bermuda North America
British Virgin Islands North America
Cayman Islands North America
Guernsey Europe
Isle of Man Europe
Jersey Europe
Saint Barthelemy North America
Turks and Caicos Islands North America
Vanuatu Oceania
Wallis and Futuna Islands Oceania

Regional Variation in Corporate Tax Rates

Corporate tax rates can vary significantly by region. Africa has the highest average statutory corporate tax rate among all regions, at 28.45 percent. Europe has the lowest average statutory corporate tax rate among all regions, at 20.27 percent.

When weighted by GDP, South America has the highest average statutory corporate tax rate at 32.01 percent. Europe has the lowest weighted average statutory corporate income tax, at 25.13 percent.

In general, larger and more industrialized nations tend to have higher corporate income tax rates than smaller nations. These rates are often above the worldwide average. The G7, which is comprised of the seven wealthiest nations in the world, has an average statutory corporate income tax rate of 27.65 percent, and a weighted average rate of 27.22 percent. OECD member states have an average statutory corporate tax rate of 23.59 percent, and a rate of 26.53 percent when weighted by GDP. The BRICS[10] have an average statutory rate of 27.40 percent, and a weighted average statutory corporate income tax rate of 26.52 percent.

Table 4. Average Corporate Tax Rate by Region or Group, 2019
Sources: Statutory corporate income tax rates are from OECD, “Table II.1. Statutory corporate income tax rate”; KPMG, “Corporate tax rates table”; and researched individually, see Tax Foundation, “worldwide-corporate-tax-rates.” GDP calculations are from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, “International Macroeconomics Data Set.”
Region Average Rate Average Rate Weighted by GDP Number of Countries Covered
Africa 28.45% 28.15% 49
Asia 21.32% 26.08% 46
Europe 20.27% 25.13% 39
North America 25.85% 26.26% 22
Oceania 23.75% 29.74% 8
South America 27.63% 32.01% 12
G7 27.65% 27.22% 7
OECD 23.59% 26.53% 36
BRICS 27.40% 26.52% 5
EU 21.77% 25.95% 28
G20 27.11% 26.94% 19
World 24.18% 26.30% 176

Distribution of Corporate Tax Rates[11]

Very few tax jurisdictions impose a corporate income tax at statutory rates greater than 35 percent. The following chart shows a distribution of corporate income tax rates among 218 jurisdictions in 2019. A plurality of countries (111 total) impose a rate between 20 and 30 percent. Twenty-four jurisdictions have a statutory corporate tax rate between 30 and 35 percent. Seventy-nine jurisdictions have a statutory corporate tax rate lower than 20 percent, and 190 jurisdictions have a corporate tax rate below 30 percent.

Figure 1.

Distribution of Worldwide Corporate Tax Rates in 2019

The Decline of Corporate Tax Rates Since 1980

Over the past 39 years, corporate tax rates have consistently declined on a global basis. In 1980, the unweighted average worldwide statutory tax rate was 40.38 percent. Today, the average statutory rate stands at 24.18 percent, representing a 40 percent reduction over the 39 years surveyed.[12]

The weighted average statutory rate has remained higher than the simple average over this period. Prior to U.S. tax reform in 2017, the United States was largely responsible for keeping the weighted average so high, given its relatively high tax rate, as well as its significant contribution to global GDP. Figure 2 shows the significant impact the change in the U.S. corporate rate had on the worldwide weighted average. The weighted average statutory corporate income tax rate has declined from 46.67 percent in 1980 to 26.30 percent in 2019, representing a 44 percent reduction over the 39 years surveyed.

Over time, more countries have shifted to taxing corporations at rates lower than 30 percent, with the United States following this trend with its tax changes at the end of 2017. This changing distribution of corporate tax rates has been far from consistent. The largest shift occurred between 2000 and 2010, with 77 percent of countries imposing a statutory rate below 30 percent in 2010 and only 41 percent of countries imposing a statutory rate below 30 percent in 2000.[13]

All regions saw a net decline in average statutory rates between 1980 and 2019. The average declined the most in Europe, with the 1980 average of 44.6 percent dropping to 20.27 percent, representing almost a 55 percent rate reduction. South America has seen the smallest decline, with the average only decreasing by 25 percent, from 36.66 percent in 1980 to 27.63 percent in 2019.

Africa, Oceania, and South America all saw periods where the average statutory rate increased, although the average rates decreased in all regions over the full period. In each instance of an average rate increase, the change was relatively small, with the absolute change being less than 2 percentage points between decades.

Figure 2.

Statutory weighted and unweighted corporate income tax rates from 1980 to 2019

The following map illustrates the global trend towards lower corporate income tax rates. Of the 138 jurisdictions for which the dataset includes the statutory income tax rates for both the years 2000 and 2019, only six countries have increased their rates during that time frame: Chile (from 15 percent to 25 percent), the Dominican Republic (from 25 percent to 27 percent), El Salvador (from 25 percent to 30 percent), Hong Kong (from 16 percent to 16.5 percent), Lebanon (from 10 percent to 17 percent), and Papua New Guinea (from 25 percent to 30 percent). Nineteen jurisdictions have the same corporate income tax rate in 2019 as in 2000, and 113 jurisdictions have decreased their rates over that time period.

Figure 3

Corporate tax trends around the world, corporate income tax trends around the world

Figure 4

Distribution of worldwide statutory corporate income tax rates, 1980-2019

Figure 5

Distribution of worldwide statutory corporate income tax rates from 1980-2019

Conclusion

Worldwide and regional average top corporate tax rates have declined over the last decades, with most countries following the trend. Of 138 jurisdictions around the world, only six have increased their corporate income tax rates between 2000 and 2019, while nineteen have not changed their rates, and 113 have decreased them. The trend would seem to be continuing, as several countries are planning to reduce their corporate tax rates in the coming years.[14]


Appendix

The Dataset

Scope

The dataset compiled for this publication includes the 2019 statutory corporate income tax rates of 218 sovereign states and dependent territories around the world. Tax rates were researched only for jurisdictions that are among the almost 250 sovereign states and dependent territories that have been assigned a country code by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). As a result, zones or territories that are independent taxing jurisdictions but do not have their own country code are not included in the dataset.

In addition, the dataset includes historic statutory corporate income tax rates for the time period 1980 to 2018. However, these years cover tax rates of fewer than 218 jurisdictions due to missing data points.

To be able to calculate average statutory corporate income tax rates weighted by GDP, the dataset includes GDP data for 176 jurisdictions. When used to calculate average statutory corporate income tax rates, either weighted by GDP or unweighted, only these 176 jurisdictions are included (to ensure the comparability of the unweighted and weighted averages).

Definition of Selected Corporate Income Tax Rate

The dataset captures standard top statutory corporate income tax rates levied on domestic businesses. This means:

  • The dataset does not reflect special tax regimes, including but not limited to patent boxes, offshore regimes, or special rates for specific industries.
  • A number of countries levy lower rates for businesses below a certain revenue threshold. The dataset does not capture these lower rates.
  • A few countries levy gross revenue taxes on businesses instead of corporate income taxes. Since the tax rates of a corporate income tax and a gross revenue tax are not comparable, these countries are excluded from the dataset.

Sources

Tax Rates for the Year 2019

For OECD countries, the statutory corporate income tax rates used are the combined corporate income tax rates provided by the OECD; see OECD, “Table II.1. Statutory corporate income tax rate,” updated April 2019, https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?DataSetCode=Table_II1. The main source for non-OECD jurisdictions are the statutory rates provided by KPMG; see KPMG, “Corporate tax rates table,” 2019, https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/services/tax/tax-tools-and-resources/tax-rates-online/corporate-tax-rates-table.html. Jurisdictions that are not part of either source were researched individually. The source for each of these jurisdictions is listed in a GitHub repository; see Tax Foundation, “worldwide-corporate-tax-rates,” GitHub, https://github.com/TaxFoundation/worldwide-corporate-tax-rates.

Tax Rates for the Years 1980-2018

Tax rates for the time frame between 1980 and 2018 are taken from a dataset compiled by the Tax Foundation over the last years. These historic rates come from multiple sources: PwC, “Worldwide Tax Summaries – Corporate Taxes,” 2010-2018; KPMG, “Corporate Tax Rate Survey,” 1998- 2003; KPMG, “Corporate tax rates table,” 2003-2018; EY, “Worldwide Corporate Tax Guide,” 2004-2018; OECD, “Historical Table II.1 – Statutory corporate income tax rate,” 1999, http://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-policy/tax-database.htm#C_CorporateCaptial; the University of Michigan – Ross School of Business, “World Tax Database,” https://www.bus.umich.edu/otpr/otpr/default.asp; and numerous government websites.

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) for the years 1980-2019

GDP calculations are from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, “International Macroeconomics Data Set,” December 2018, https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/international-macroeconomic-data-set/.


[1] Unless otherwise noted, calculated averages of statutory corporate income tax rates only include jurisdictions for which GDP data is available for all years between 1980 and 2019. For 2019, the dataset includes statutory corporate income tax rates of 218 jurisdictions, but GDP data is available for only 176 jurisdictions, reducing the number of jurisdictions included in calculated averages to 176. For years prior to 2019, the number of countries included in calculated averages varies by year due to missing corporate tax rates; that is, the 1980 average includes statutory corporate income tax rates of 74 jurisdictions compared to 176 jurisdictions in 2019.

[2] Statutory corporate income tax rates are from OECD, “Table II.1. Statutory corporate income tax rate,” updated April 2019, https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?DataSetCode=Table_II1; KPMG, “Corporate tax rates table,” https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/services/tax/tax-tools-and-resources/tax-rates-online/corporate-tax-rates-table.html; and researched individually, see Tax Foundation, “worldwide-corporate-tax-rates,” GitHub, https://github.com/TaxFoundation/worldwide-corporate-tax-rates. GDP calculations are from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, “International Macroeconomics Data Set,” December 2018, https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/international-macroeconomic-data-set/.

[3] Kari Jahnsen and Kyle Pomerleau, “Corporate Income Tax Rates around the World, 2017,” Tax Foundation, Sept. 7, 2017, https://taxfoundation.org/corporate-income-tax-rates-around-the-world-2017/.

[4] As no averages are presented in this section, it covers all 218 jurisdictions for which 2019 corporate income tax rates were found (thus including jurisdictions for which GDP data was not available).

[5] This average is lower than the average of the 176 jurisdictions because many of the jurisdictions for which no GDP data is available are small economies with low corporate income tax rates.

[6] Although called the “top 20 rates,” they include 21 jurisdictions because Cameroon, Colombia, Saint Kitts and Nevis, and the Seychelles all have the same corporate income tax rate of 33 percent.

[7] Major industrialized nations are those that are members of the OECD.

[8] Although called the “bottom 20 rates,” they include 21 jurisdictions because Cyprus, Ireland, and Liechtenstein all have the same tax rate.

[9] This tax rate can be as high as 46 percent. See Deloitte, “International Tax – Bahrain Highlights,” last updated April 2019, https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Tax/dttl-tax-bahrainhighlights-2019.pdf.

[10] BRICS is a group of countries with major emerging economies. The members of this group are Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa.

[11] As no averages are presented in this chapter, it covers all 218 jurisdictions for which 2019 corporate income tax rates were found (thus including jurisdictions for which GDP data was not available).

[12] Historical data comes from multiple sources: PwC, “Worldwide Tax Summaries – Corporate Taxes,” 2010-2018; KPMG, “Corporate Tax Rate Survey,” 1998- 2003; KPMG, “Corporate tax rates table,” 2003-2018; EY, “Worldwide Corporate Tax Guide,” 2004-2018; OECD, “Historical Table II.1 – Statutory corporate income tax rate,” 1999, http://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-policy/tax-database.htm#C_CorporateCaptial; the University of Michigan – Ross School of Business, “World Tax Database,” https://www.bus.umich.edu/otpr/otpr/default.asp; and numerous government websites.

[13] This section of the report covers all 218 jurisdictions for which 2019 corporate income tax rates were found (thus including jurisdictions for which GDP data was not available).

[14] Daniel Bunn, “Upcoming Corporate Tax Rate Reductions in Developed Countries,” Tax Foundation, Sept. 13, 2018, https://taxfoundation.org/upcoming-corporate-tax-rate-reductions-developed-countries/.